Train more on a defense slice
When
You already care about someone’s incoming (or the team’s holds) and you want a build signal from those fights: which troops to train more of, given what actually showed up on the wall.
Focus
A defense pile first:
- That player’s defenses
- Their main-only defenses
- Another defense cut you already named
Take the post-focus summary so you know whose holds you are on. Do not ask train-more from the whole battlefield.
Step-4 asks (same intent)
- “What troops should they train?”
- “What should [name] build more of?”
- “What should I train for this defense?”
- “Which layers have the most upside and the least downside if they get wiped?”
You should get a layer table (type × tier) that weighs the tradeoff: kills those layers got in this pile versus the points those layers put at risk if they were wiped. High kills with a huge wipe-cost is not automatically “train more of this.” Low-tier volume with a smaller point risk can win that balance. Effectiveness nets the two sides; the answer should not be kills-per-troop dressed as a build order.
Common miss
Asking from the event root, or while still on their attacks. That blends nights or the wrong side. Stay on the defense slice. A high number on a tiny band is not a training plan. Atlas: layers and train-more.
“What should they train?” needs the holds they actually fought.
A build signal from kills versus wipe-cost only works on a defense pile in the library — not from three opening screenshots and a memory of last night. Fast Read the event, focus that player’s defenses (or the team’s holds), then ask which layers have upside without a ruinous downside.
New customers can start with a 7-day trial. Plans start at $14.99/month with full feature access.