Team commitment

“Did we show up” is the question leadership actually needs, and the mailbox does not answer it as a feeling. It answers it as who appeared on the attack side of which rallies, at what size, and whether later joins were still full.

By hand this is a grid: every rally of a type × every roster name × full vs depleted. That is a spreadsheet people start and abandon.

Focus

The team’s rallies of one troop type — not one player, not a keep timeline.

You may get a table on the way in: who held, who fell off, full vs dust, Effectiveness and Exchange Ratio split that way. That table is the start of the argument, not the end.

Why this used to die as a daydream

Voice attendance ≠ report presence. A player can be in every rally in comms and missing from the structured side, or present as a sliver. The useful number is joins of this type, and whether those joins were still a real march.

Questions (any wording)

Presence

Full vs depleted

Trade, not just show-up

After the table

What a good answer looks like

A table you can argue with in the room (copy button). Definitions of “full” vs “depleted” stated. No claim about click speed or “they didn’t try” — presence and march quality only.

Common miss

Expecting this family to draw the keep tear-down. Different subset. Or asking “who rallied” with no troop type, which blends four nights into one mush.